I suggest you ...

Prevent a user to suppress a specific message

For example I wouldn't want anybody to turn off message '527 Unreachable'. I got some good help on your forum, please see this thread: http://www.gimpel.com/Discussion.cfm?ThreadID=4512. But I think it would be very good if you could add a more intuitive interface for doing this than what's suggested in the thread. Maybe something like this
+e527
+efreeze{527}

7 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anders WallanderAnders Wallander shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

    1 comment

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Fredrik JohanssonFredrik Johansson commented  · 

        I think it would be nice to get a warning for disabling a unsuppressable warning (162?), and that that 162 itself also should be able to suppress. The 162 suppression warning have a high severity, and it shall not be used often.

        I mean, in a large organization you want to enforce a coding standard by stating that some warnings are very important, and hence shall not be suppressed. But in some rare cases disabling a warning might be the best option.

        It shall of cause be possible to do efreeze on the 162 warning, and that will disable users to disable other unsuppressable warnings.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base